The Larger Bench of the CESTAT has on 12 December 2024 held that an assessee is eligible for benefit under Sl. No. 32 of Notification No. 4/2006-C.E., dated 1 March 2006 on procurement of sulphuric acid for manufacture of zinc sulphate (agriculture grade). Sl. No. 32 of the notification provided for nil rate of central excise duty on sulphuric acid used in the manufacture of fertilizers. The assessee was represented by Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan Attorneys here.

The Madras High Court has quashed the Order passed by the Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs refusing to grant patent in respect of a Divisional Application on the ground that the same was filed after the grant of patent in respect of the original patent application filed by the applicant-appellant.

The Supreme Court has on 20 November 2024 held that the telecom companies are entitled to avail Cenvat credit of the central excise duty paid on towers and shelters/Pre-fabricated buildings (PFBs) procured by them and installed/erected for providing output services of telecommunication services. One of the assessee was represented by Lakshmikumaran & Sridharan Attorneys here.