x
IPR Amicus: January 2019

Liabilities of an intermediary – The Indian perspective By R. Parthasarathy & Godhuli Nanda In a recent case Delhi High Court has observed that when an e-commerce company claims exemption under Se

IPR Amicus: December 2018

Regularization of non-compliance with the Biological Diversity Act, 2002 By Dr. Deepti Malhotra and Dr. Malathi Lakshmikumaran India regulates access to biological resources under its national biodiversity

IPR Amicus: November 2018

Scope of Section 3(i): An analysis on diagnostic methods of treatment By Dr. Deepti Malhotra, and Dr. Malathi Lakshmikumaran TRIPS agreement provides flexibility

IPR Amicus: October 2018

Foreign filing license – Some issues By Dipan Banerjee and Ankur Garg If a person wishes to file a patent application in foreign countries, he has to obtain a w

IPR Amicus: August 2018

Recently, Delhi High Court delivered a judgment in favour of Philips in the consolidated matters namely Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. vs. Rajesh Bansal & Ors.

IPR Amicus: August 2018

Standard Essential Patents - The Philips judgement & unanswered questions By Sutapa Jana Recently, Delhi High Court delivered a judgment in favour of Philips in t

IPR Amicus: July 2018

Delhi High Court recently granted interim injunction to the plaintiffs restraining the defendants from using the trade mark or the trade name ‘HM Megabrands’.

IPR Amicus: July 2018

Goodwill and reputation of trademark in India - Worldwide prior use plays significant role By Ashna Pruthi Delhi High Cour

IPR Amicus: June 2018

Last month Delhi High Court held that use of a single colour as against a combination of colours does not qualify as a ‘mark’ under Section 2(1)(m) and as a ‘trademark’ under Section 2(1)(zb) of the Trademark Act.

IPR Amicus: June 2018

Infringement or passing off in use of single colour as trademark By Prince Bharti and Manoj Gupta Last month Delhi High Court held that use of a single colour as