July 2015 issue of International Trade Amicus covers an article titled ‘Courting balance between investor and host-State in ISDS’. In this article, the author discusses different approaches to ensure investor protection without compromising on certain sovereign rights of a State.

An article discussing the merits and demerits of the proposal made to enhance the rights of third party under WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) is covered under Article Section of this International Trade Amicus issue. Tables containing trade remedy measures by and agains

An article pertaining to the time-limit in anti-dumping reviews in India is the topic of discussion in May, 2015 issue in which the author states the requirement for a suitable amendment in Rule 23 (2) of AD Rules, to put at rest the anomaly relating to time limit in review. This Amicus as u

India has proposed a new model of Bilateral Investment Treaty to address several issues it has been facing including claims from foreign investors based on taxation and the allegation that India failed to provide proper investment climate. In this issue of International Trade Amicus readers

Article in this March 2015 issue of International Trade Amicus seeks to analyze whether the time period for completing a mid-term or sunset review can be extended beyond the statutory time period of 12 months, and whether such extension is in consonance with the Act and AD Rules. Considering

Remand power of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in anti-dumping cases has been taken up for discussion in this month’s International Trade Amicus. According to the author, there is no clarity in the provisions inasmuch as despite having an inherent power to

Should India join the Information Technology Agreement-II? Article in this issue of International Trade Amicus after discussing various views, both in favour and against the agreement, concludes that it would be better for India to wait and watch how things take shape in 2015.

The article in this month´s issue of International Trade Amicus does a comparative analysis of the procedures of conducting a hearing in an anti-dumping investigation.

This issue brings to readers an article on the ongoing dispute relating to USA’s certain Country of Origin Labelling Requirements (COOL), as raised by Canada and Mexico.

Refund of anti-dumping duty as a result of review investigation has been taken up for discussion by the author in the article carried in this issue of International Trade Amicus. According to the author, procedural dichotomy in the law is required to be remedied through harmonious reading of the p