The WTO panel recently ruled against India’s import duty measures in relation to certain Information and Communication Technology (‘ICT’) goods, holding the measures as inconsistent with Articles II:1(a) and (b) of the GATT 1994.
The article in this issue of International Trade Amicus intends to bridge the awareness gap with respect to trade remedial investigations, and sensitize producers/exporters on certain aspects which will help prepare them for any potential trade remedial investigation.
The article in this issue of International Trade Amicus analyses a recent CESTAT decision relating to the threshold for considering a product within the scope of the product under consideration (‘PUC’) in anti-dumping investigations.
The article in this issue of International Trade Amicus discusses as to whether a government action in the form of an export restraint on the export of a product results in a subsidy to the domestic producers of downstream products.
The retrospective amendments proposed by the Finance Bill, 2023 to Section 9C and other related provisions of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 have tried to resolve the dispute regarding powers of the CESTAT to entertain appeals against the Ministry of Finance’s refusal to impose the trade ...
The article in this issue of International Trade Amicus elaborately analyses the recent imposition of definitive anti-dumping duty by the European Union on imports of fatty acid originating from Indonesia.
The WTO Panel has recently held that USA’s additional duties of 25% ad valorem on imports of steel products and 10% ad valorem on imports of aluminium products are inconsistent with various provisions of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (‘GATT’), ...
In continuation of the article published last month, shedding light on the nature and extent of Western sanctions, the article in this issue of International Trade Amicus intends to discuss some of the salient aspects of the US sanctions regime as administered by the Office...
The Ukraine-Russia conflict has brought into focus the use of sanctions as an instrument to penalize. While sanctions as an instrument are well known among political and economic institutions in the West, comparatively little attention has been paid to Western sanctions by businesses in India.
Recently the Gujarat High Court in the case Real Strips v. Union of India had an occasion to decide the nature of powers exercised by the Ministry of Finance in deciding the imposition of countervailing duty.