x
International Trade Amicus: January 2019

Manual of Operating Practices for trade remedy investigations - A step towards transparency By Neeraj Chhabra Directorate General of Trade Remedies (DGTR) recently issued Manual of Operating Pract

International Trade Amicus: December 2018

Rule 22 and jurisprudence: Duty margins for new shippers in case of sampling in original investigation By Greetika Francis Rule 22 of the Indian Anti-Dumping Rules allows authorities to carry out review of

International Trade Amicus: November 2018

Indonesia - Iron or Steel Safeguards: Metallurgic jurisprudence on definition of a "Safeguard Measure" By Bhargav Mansatta and Jayant Raghu Ram A "safeguard measure" has to be

International Trade Amicus: October 2018

Respite for Indian domestic industry: “Negative” final findings of Designated Authority appealable By Neeraj Chhabra Recently Delhi High Court, in the case of Jindal Poly Film, held th

International Trade Amicus: September 2018

Has the clock stopped ticking? India’s export subsidies under the SCM Agreement By Jayant Raghu Ram The United States has upped the ante in its efforts to – what it perceives – re

International Trade Amicus: August 2018

Circumvention of anti-dumping duty is one of the foremost challenges for investigating authorities.

International Trade Amicus: August 2018

Anti-circumvention investigation concerning Glass Fibre: Resolving inconsistencies in practice and interpretation By Jayant Raghu Ram Circumvention of anti-dumping duty is one of the foremost chall

International Trade Amicus: July 2018

Panel report in Australia - Plain packaging: A “Healthy” verdict By Jayant Raghu Ram WTO recently circulated the panel report in the Plain Packaging complaints brought against Australia

International Trade Amicus: July 2018

Panel report in Australia - Plain packaging: A “Healthy” verdict By Jayant Raghu Ram WTO recently circulated the panel report in the Plain Packaging complaints brought against Australia

International Trade Amicus: June 2018

Delhi High Court has recently held that extensions of anti-dumping duty post expiry of the duty in force, whether it be one-year extension in the interim of sunset review or five-year extension in view of likelihood of recurrence or continuation of dumping and injury to the domestic industry pursuant to a sunset review determination, are both impermissible.